Which Superlow springs are lower? Kings Superlows or Lovells Superlows? :confused:

I think i remember reading that the lovells are lower

pm anthony from RPW he can tell u for sure

my gut feeling is lovels

pm anthony from RPW he can tell u for sure

my gut feeling is lovels

Phillcom Rally....lol

Kings don't make a super low rear, lovells of memory are 50mm and kings 55mm, i think.

pm anthony from RPW he can tell u for sure

my gut feeling is lovels

Good idea. why didnt i think of that b4. lol

super low lovels r the lowest ;)

super low lovels r the lowest ;)
lovells it is then.. :P thanx

Are Lovells really lower? I have Lovs in my car and I thought it didn't seem to sit as low as some of the other magnas out there.

Would the KYB suspension or camber kit have something to do with it?

hey, i have purcahsed lovells super low front, low rear, and KYB's all round......i know this is getting very low, do i need any camber kits aswell?
im worried ill put all this in, get it and it'll turn like a mofo.....

also does anyone know for sure what the difference is between the king super lows and lovell superlows? in height i mean?

Cheers, paul

']hey, i have purcahsed lovells super low front, low rear, and KYB's all round......i know this is getting very low, do i need any camber kits aswell?
im worried ill put all this in, get it and it'll turn like a mofo.....

also does anyone know for sure what the difference is between the king super lows and lovell superlows? in height i mean?

Cheers, paul

My ride still turns fine, no issues there...

super low lovels r the lowest ;)

My mate got Ultra Lows, yes thats right LOWER and he has a VP commodore dunno if they exist for Magnas!

My mate got Ultra Lows, yes thats right LOWER and he has a VP commodore dunno if they exist for Magnas!

Haven't heard of them for magnas but the thought is definatly interesting...

Only problem, insted of having trouble getting in and out of my drive way i would end up just parking my car out on the curb...

my lovells superlows are lower than my mates kings super lows

but still not low enuff lol

I dont see the interest in getting any lower. Every lowered car of my mates ive been in, we get to a driveway or speed hump and they slow to like 1km an hour and go at the thing at a 45 degree angle.

Sure lower looks better but is it really worth it?

If i were to lower my car it would be for the handling benefits. As im looking at getting extractors which sit low on the 3.0L, I wouldnt want anything near as low as some of you.

Which brings me to my question. Are there springs that are lower than stock but higher than lows? Like alot of people have superlows front, lows rear. Is there like meds to go lows front meds rear?

I dont see the interest in getting any lower. Every lowered car of my mates ive been in, we get to a driveway or speed hump and they slow to like 1km an hour and go at the thing at a 45 degree angle.

Sure lower looks better but is it really worth it?

If i were to lower my car it would be for the handling benefits. As im looking at getting extractors which sit low on the 3.0L, I wouldnt want anything near as low as some of you.

Which brings me to my question. Are there springs that are lower than stock but higher than lows? Like alot of people have superlows front, lows rear. Is there like meds to go lows front meds rear?


worth it yes!
lower-ish springs... try vrx springs mate

yeh mate, kings and lovells make super lows and then they have the lows which are about 30mm.

Which Superlow springs are lower? Kings Superlows or Lovells Superlows? :confused:
i'm pretty sure that kingsprings superlows are a 60mm drop but only avilable for the front of a magna. the lowest for the rears are lows which are a 40mm drop.

whereas the lovells superlows are 50mm drop but are available all around.

so you will have a 50mm drop all around with lovells

or a 60/40mm drop with kings... i reckon the lovells will look the best!


I dont see the interest in getting any lower. Every lowered car of my mates ive been in, we get to a driveway or speed hump and they slow to like 1km an hour and go at the thing at a 45 degree angle.

Sure lower looks better but is it really worth it?

i have superlows all around compressed a bit more so around a 100mm drop or more atm. on some driveways i will scrape a little but nothing a bit of angle can fix. Speed humps? easy! dont' need to slow to stop, just need to know how to nvaigate them!

and god damn magna's look soooooo much better lowered.


My mate got Ultra Lows, yes thats right LOWER and he has a VP commodore dunno if they exist for Magnas!
No, ultralows are not avialable for magna's. Ultralows are a 80mm drop.

i'm pretty sure that kingsprings superlows are a 60mm drop but only avilable for the front of a magna. the lowest for the rears are lows which are a 40mm drop.

whereas the lovells superlows are 50mm drop but are available all around.

so you will have a 50mm drop all around with lovells

or a 60/40mm drop with kings... i reckon the lovells will look the best!


Thanks for the info. A mate has lovells superlows and I couldn't see a big difference against my kings low (40mm) which confirms my thoughts that Kings Superlows may be lower. Whats the price on getting them compressed and how long does the process take? Thinking is it better to get the kings low compressed instead of going superlows... anyone wanna sell their Kings superlows rears? lol

heres a pic of 3 different types of springs :D

from what we could see, Lovell's (SILENCR) had the lowest front, Pedders (ASYLUM) had the Lowest rear, and LZYBOY is running kings.

http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d1/asylum83/100_0955.jpg

heres a pic of 3 different types of springs :D

from what we could see, Lovell's (SILENCR) had the lowest front, Pedders (ASYLUM) had the Lowest rear, and LZYBOY is running kings.


These are all superlows i take it.. I bit hard to see from the pic mate. The first car is blocking the view of the others..lol so how did the kings compared to the lovells and pedders? :cool: i seriously think when 19s are on superlows ain't gonna be low enough..lol

yeah i couldnt find any good pics of all 3 with even angles,
this one is a bit better
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d1/asylum83/100_0959.jpg

we are all running the "super low" version of each brand front and rear. its reasonably easy to see the different in the height of the front of the cars, especially looking at headlight levels

yeah i couldnt find any good pics of all 3 with even angles,
this one is a bit better

we are all running the "super low" version of each brand front and rear. its reasonably easy to see the different in the height of the front of the cars, especially looking at headlight levels

Thanks. I'm more concerned about the height of the rear but as you mentioned earlier, pedders got the lowest rear..looks like compressing is the way to go to get it slammed. any chance you got the pic of the rears? i think choonga was saying kings superlows are lowest....

Thanks. I'm more concerned about the height of the rear but as you mentioned earlier, pedders got the lowest rear..looks like compressing is the way to go to get it slammed. any chance you got the pic of the rears? i think choonga was saying kings superlows are lowest....

from what we could see, kings superlows were the highest out of the bunch! i admit my shocks are reasonably worn, so i could be squatting a tad more than normal, but shouldn't make too much difference.

this is the only photo i have of the rear
http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d1/asylum83/100_0948.jpg

a bit hard to tell really though from that angle!