PDA

View Full Version : 1985: Wheels Car Of The Year(coming soon)



Tessa403
25-04-2007, 08:25 AM
Wheels Febuary 1986!

MITSUBISHI'S MAGNA is the 1985 Car Of
The Year, most prestigious award for automotive excellence in Australia.
Now in its 23rd year, and the longest running award of its type in the world, the WHEELS COTY has gone to a mainstream sedan that is both innovative in design and execution and yet surely the most significant new car released in Australia in years.
The Magna creates, in one brilliant move, a new class of car that bridges the gap between the traditional Australian six cylinder family sedans and the four cylinder medium models.
That it manages to offer the best of both worlds, within a package that has sent rival manufacturers back to the drawing boards, only confirms the impact this car will have on the local scene until well into the 1990's.
Equally important, Mitsubishi has been able to price the car so competitively that it is undoubtedly the best value for money on the entire market. Bar none. The achievement is spectacular, just as much as the effect on the opposition is devastating.
Only one car came close to equaling the Magna on the Australian motoring scene in 1985. Toyota's superb new Celica is so vastly superior to any previous Celica that it is hard to believe it came from the same company, let alone the same engineering team. But the two-plus-two coupe Celica coupe is of limited importance compared to the significance of the Magna. So, despite its magnificent chassis and engine and breathtakingly original body, Toyota's best effort in years is still overshadowed by the new four door sedan from Mitsubishi.
It took no more than a brief turn at the wheel to realise that the Magna was going to cause the four other local car makers real problems although (and they are the first to admit it) all four under-estimated the car. The embattled Mitsubishi, they believed, didn't have the resources in money or people to come up with a true class leader that would not only take over from the declining Sigma but even reach up to steal sales away from the Commodore and Falcon.

By combining the improved performance and economy of the now most impressive Astron II 2.6 litre four cylinder engine with a wider body that made the car effectively more roomy than a Commodore, and with the balance, poise and finesse of the better European medium Sized/.ed sedans, Mitsubishi's small team of engineers has produced a world-beater. Comparisons with the Audi 100 are indeed valid.

The three-tiered range of sedans (wagon versions will be released late this year) gives a broad spread of models that is logically spaced to ensure the widest possible market coverage. Even the base GLX is well specified, because all Magnas come with the 2.6 litre engine, four wheel disc brakes and five speed gearbox as standard equipment. A poverty model is not listed. Mode'1 for model the Magna offers more features at a lower price than any of its rivals.

With its attractive, modern and clean styling it is not surprising that sales have exceeded Mitsubishi's expectations. The company set a target of 22,000 Magnas for '85 but, by working almost every other Saturday and improving general efficiency, the Adelaide plant has been able to crank out almost 30,000 and expects to sell around 38,000 in 1986.
The plant was capable of 260 cars a day during '85 but will reach 300 a day during '86. These figures include around 11,000 Colts and 12,000 Sigmas although when the Magna wagon arrives sales of the Sigma — the wagon version of which now accounts for more than 50 percent of total Sigma sales — are expected to slow quickly.

Mitsubishi believes the extreme buoyancy of the new car market in '85 protected the Commodore and Falcon from the full force of the Magna and it sees '86 as the year both will suffer as the effect of the Federal Government's tax on company cars begins to hit home. The Magna is the logical step for the fleets to take in moving away from the traditional six cylinder cars. It is, as drivers of company cars will discover, n down which the Sigma was during the rush cylinder cars in '79 and '80. No, fleet experience has shown the Magna up in a most favourable light.

Mitsubishi's product planning department thinking about a replacement for the GJ Sigma months before that car was finally released, 1982. The intention was to repeat the success
Sigma with a car which was a more efficiency and which offered substantially more interior room and boot space. The target release date for the car given the code name GL (as a logical carry-over Sigma code) was April 1986.

High on the list of priorities was the ability three adults across the back seat with adequate excessive leg room and an overall feeling of ': spaciousness. The planners wanted improved} performance and fuel economy (hence the need the weight down), greater levels of comfort, serviceability and quietness and an ability to to at least match the towing ability of the GJ Sigma.

Tessa403
25-04-2007, 08:48 AM
All this thinking for the future was going 01 when the Falcon was clearly going to be even more successful than Ford believed possible after a r slow period following the launch of the XD in 1979. The Valiant was still being built in very limited numbers and the product planners felt the Sigma 86 should attempt to cover some of the ground lost by the demise of the Valiant. The first alternative was to stretch rear drive Sigma in both wheel base and width and design studies of this concept were made up to of of having a tape drawing done to give management idea of how such a car would look.

There were obvious limitations with the rear drive, the transmission tunnel detracted from interior s and made the centre position in the rear seat a rather poor compromise. With the increase in dimensions the wheel base was to go to 2580 mm, an increase 50 mm, while another 125 mm would be added to the overall width and 100 mm to overall length — there would also have been a substantial increase in weight and it was felt that a genuinely new car could be do for less money. The NAP - New Above the Platform approach was seen as taking Mitsubishi Australia a a dead-end course because the Japanese had made their minds to go front drive for the Sigma replacement

The wheelbase for this new front drive car had been set at 2000 mm in order to appeal to world markets but the car's width was still limited, by Japanese tax constraints to under 1.7 m. This meant that the YF Sigma — Mitsubishi's code-name for the front drive car couldn't hope to match the packaging targets set in Australia. The product planning department, had decided it needed 7475 mm of shoulder room the Sigma was 1350mm in the front and 1155mm in the rear. Front leg room was at 1040 and rear at 925.

Shoulder room was the critical dimension. In April decision to pick up the front drive car was made, but at the same time the engineering department was aware that squeezing the 2.6 litre Astron engine into the compartment of the front drive Sigma presented problems. The answer was obvious, especially since, in to meet local content requirements, Mitsubishi planned to tool for most of the panels locally. By stretching the body 65 mm in width the required shoulder room was required. the engine fitted perfectly and Mitsubishi had, almost unintentionally, created a new class of car for Australia.

Every transverse panel in the new car had to be re-engineered; it was not simply a case of cutting the car the car down middle and adding another 65 mm of sheet metal.
The small central tunnel for exhaust and plumbing was retained and the extra width was added
either side. The dashboard is not symmetrical, the sunvisors had to be altered and even the Fuel tank was led to take advantage of the additional space that was available under the car.

The transformation from Sigma to Magna was achieved in a thoroughly professional manner with nothing left to chance. Development of a more powerful and efficient 2.6 litre engine meant the Magna also required a stronger five speed manual transmission and drive shafts, which it got, along with a re-rated four speed automatic. Bigger wheels were lilted to improve
ground clearance and the bucket seats were widened. During '83 the engineers realised that the two litre wouldn't be able to meet the performance standards set for the car so it was quietly dropped from program. Four wheel disc-brake's were confirmed they were felt to be to be a necessary item if the car was to achieve the desired image.
In may '83 after the GJ Sigma had been released to less than enthusiastic press and dealer's, the decision was made to take' six months out of the cars development time for a launch date of October '85. At the same time the need for a third model line was clearly forseen. The general move upwards in specification had been obvious for sometime, although though the 70's it had always been the six cylinderfamily sedans that lagged behind the Japanese medium
(even small) cars in equipment.

By late 83 yet another six months was taken out the development time to give a release dale of April 85. This meant the wagon was put back to 86 and a sporting version was dropped, By now the code name was TM and rumors that Mitsubishi was working unique car for Australia had begun to filter through.

Engineering was hard at work on a steering damper to mask the big four's inherent vibration.' a sophisticated engine mounting system was being devised to ensure low levels of NVH. The front bumper bar became the biggest single automotive moulding made in Australia. By November 83 a prototype program was in hand that would see over half a Kms of testing before the first production cars came off the line in early 85.

At this stage the engineering department was-debating the need for a fold-down seal to keep in line with cars like the Ford Telstar/Mazda 626. But testing showed that the high boot lip and the fixed rear -contributed enormously to the car's overall quietness: both were retained.

In November/December 84 pilot cars were road tested against the competition and Mitsubishi realised it had a clear winner, a fact that was reinforced by our comparison test which had the Magna up against the Commodore, Telstar, Bluebird and Sigma. lt was an obvious winner in virtually every department least value for money and more importantly I' Magna rendered all the others old fashioned.

Significantly among the first customers for the Magna were the product planning departments for Holden, Ford, Toyota and Nissan. The car has been sent back to Japan for comparative testing. It goes without saying that it will be influential in deciding the specification of tomorrow's cars from the other local car makers.

Even now the Magna has a full year until Toyota's front drive Corona finally' arrives and Toyota says that this car will not be wide bodied, in the manner of the Magna and two years until the new Commodore and Falcon. Nissan s new Bluebird is just weeks away but it too will be under the 1.7 m width limit.

The Magna, it seems, has the specification, the price and the driver appeal to stay on top for years to more worthy COTY is hard to imagine.

Just a couple of scans of the Clay Models of the original Magna.
http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r94/tessa403/pies%20stuff/COTY01-1.jpg
http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r94/tessa403/pies%20stuff/COTY02.jpg

Neo
25-04-2007, 10:13 AM
See!! How good is the magna?

They should have kept the 1st gen to date, and just put their money into new good engines for the 1st gen. :)


http://www.joshuaburford.com/magna/history1.jpg
http://www.joshuaburford.com/magna/history2.jpg

Aströn Boy
25-04-2007, 05:33 PM
so want the 2nd dash and interior, spec in those colors