As requested: A Sticky for all your 380 dyno charts.

Please post your charts and a short description of your mods, the conditions when you dyno'd, fuel etc.

Don't spam this thread with discussion. If you want to discuss your dyno results please post in this thread

Mod:
Sports exhaust - 2.5" system from headers with resonator and sports muffler only.

Fuel
98RON

Transmission:
5 speed Tiptronic

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z179/Krossbolt/Car%20Pics/My%20Car/KWSportsExrdi.jpg

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z179/Krossbolt/Car%20Pics/My%20Car/HPSportsExrdi.jpg

http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z179/Krossbolt/Car%20Pics/My%20Car/AFRSportsExrdi.jpg

MOD:
Chip Torque Exede Processor
90mm AIr Intake
K&N Filter
Sports exhaust 2.5" with Supacat striaght through muffler and third catalytic converter removed.

Fuel:

98 RON

Transmission:

5 speed Tiptronic


http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z179/Krossbolt/Car%20Pics/My%20Car/ChpT130208.jpg


http://i189.photobucket.com/albums/z179/Krossbolt/Car%20Pics/My%20Car/147a.jpg

Notes: Intake temp was very high; colder intake should hit 200hp. Hi and LO values mean dual maps - Lo is for lower quality fuel or better fuel economy.

Special Thanks to Chip Torque; first 380 auto to be chipped in Australia.

Unichip Q installed.

http://i253.photobucket.com/albums/hh60/foozrcool/Dynochart-1_zps98195894.jpg (http://s253.photobucket.com/user/foozrcool/media/Dynochart-1_zps98195894.jpg.html)

Okay, I finally got mine dynoed. While not in the same league as Knotched and Foozrcool, I was pleased to see mine's made the same power as Knotched's first dyno run, despite having different mods.
What I have here is: Berklee straight thru rear muffler, US Galant 90mm intake, K&N filter, removed under-bonnet front rubber strip, removed plastic engine cover, and running 98 octane fuel.
So for people running these simple & affordable mods, this is roughly what you will recieve.

http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh10/grubco/Scan10002.jpg

The video has been posted on YouTube also, and shows 139kW and 200+km/h. It is the ONLY video of a 380 having dyno power run.

http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/5603/18092008119rt9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/18092008119rt9.jpg/1/w640.png (http://g.imageshack.us/img329/18092008119rt9.jpg/1/)

Needless to say not happy.

This is with 90mm intake
K&N Panel Filter
2.5" exhaust with high flow muffler all stainless steel
Custom Extractors
Unichip Q fitted and (supposedly) tuned.

heres the proof

http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc24/magna1995/pics030.jpg

well tonight went to SKR and stuck my car on the rollers. i wanted a before reading before i start doing the engine mods.


average was 149kw atw. highest was 150.3kw atw. its a good starting point. got an intake restriction at the top end so will be looking at custom maf sensor and throttle body.


engine mods on this run were

2.5" exhaust from headers back into twin 2.5" at rear
galant 90mm intake
secondry intake (50mm)

http://i215.photobucket.com/albums/cc24/magna1995/pics243.jpg

Got back a while ago from SKR after having some dyno runs.

Sorry boys & girls, some of you may be a little disappointed with my results.

Seems we have a new NA 380 king!

183.6kw and 375.5NM atw

Scans attached.

I tried four different combinations:

1. With K&N filter and 'enhanced' lower resonator mod (i.e. how I run it as standard)
2. With stock air filter & enhanced lower resonator mod
3. With K&N filter & lower resonator mod blocked off
4. With stock air filter & lower resonator mod blocked off

The results were very close for all four configurations, ranging from 181.9kw to 183.6kw.

The stock air filter element consistently gave better results than the K&N.

Maybe because my K&N is a little dirty and the stocker is relatively clean.

I have not over oiled my K&N.

But there seems little doubt that the stocker is at least as good as the K&N if not slightly better.

With the intake lower resonator mod (end cut off and connected by a tube to the open driving light hole), it made very little difference to the power whether I had it open or blocked off, but surprisingly top end torque (5,000 rpm plus) was a bit better with it blocked off.

Steve was happy with the results and pleasantly surprised by them (me too!).

I asked him about a piggyback ECU and he reckoned I would be wasting my time considering the power & torque figures I am already getting. He said the stock ECU adapts very well to 98 RON (which I use exclusively), by advancing the timing and leaning out the AFR a bit, and a piggyback wouldn't do a better job.

KJ.

Ok... I have deleted like a million posts from this thread that are noting to do with the original topic. Please use this thread to only post your dyno results.

All discussion about the dyno results are to go into this thread here...

http://www.aussiemagna.com/forums/showthread.php?t=70401

Here's my dynochart of the tuned Series 5 Sprintex blower.

http://i253.photobucket.com/albums/hh60/foozrcool/CCF12092009_00000_zpsa843b708.jpg (http://s253.photobucket.com/user/foozrcool/media/CCF12092009_00000_zpsa843b708.jpg.html)

Dyno was done at the Street Torque (3/10/09 no the date shown). 203fwhp for naturally aspirated V6 factory tune. Mods included exhaust and air-intake...oh and done on the 22's.
http://i579.photobucket.com/albums/ss237/Maffsho0/Photo0070.jpg

never mind.

OK, finally had my ChipTorque Exede fitted & tuned by Steve Knight yesterday.

Before runs (with Exede fitted but with bypass plug inserted) showed between 160 and 163 kw atw. And very rich AFRs, which we expected.

About 21kw less than my earlier runs back in August 2009. All sorts of possible reasons for this difference, including larger wheels & tyres (245/35 19 v 235/45 18), slightly different weather conditions (but not much), incorrect parameters set by Steve last time (I think this is a strong possibility, note the big difference in SAE J607 correction parameters, from around 2.8 last time to 3.95 this time), and this time I noticed/heard a lot more slip on the rollers.

Steve reckoned that Mitsu motors have good days and bad days, and the day back in August 2009 must have been a good day and yesterday was a bad day!

I reckon the slip was a big factor, when I drove it off the rollers the front wheels were spinning on the concrete floor at 1200 rpm!

The after runs, once Steve had tuned the Exede, showed 168 - 170kw atw. So a reasonable increase in top end power.

I was hoping for an increase in torque in the mid-range, but this didn't happen, instead I got a reasonable increase in the top end, from about 4,000 rpm onwards.

The main change was in the AFRs, now tuned so that it runs between 12.5 and 13.4 instead of the horribly rich 9.6 to 11 that it was running.

I've noticed a significant increase in fuel economy already, from around 11.6 l/100k to around 10l/100k. Early days yet, but it's looking good.

It feels punchier in the mid to upper range, and happier to rev out to the rev limiter.

Other main change Steve made was to advance the timing a bit. The map already in the Exede was apparently tuned for 95RON and had 'only' 1.5 degrees advance, so Steve took it out to 4 degrees advance. I didn't check if he meant 4 degrees advance on the stock 6 degrees retard (ending up with 2 degrees retard), or a true 4 degrees advance. I think it was the latter.

Photos of the installed Exede and the dyno print outs below.

KJ.


http://i990.photobucket.com/albums/af28/kj380/kj380s%20Mitsubishi%20380/Exede1.jpg

Note the nifty mounting bracket. A DIY job, $6 fencing bracket from Bunnings!

http://i990.photobucket.com/albums/af28/kj380/kj380s%20Mitsubishi%20380/Exede2.jpg

Different angle showing more detail of mounting bracket.

http://i990.photobucket.com/albums/af28/kj380/kj380s%20Mitsubishi%20380/kj380SKRdyno17-4-10run1.jpg

Check out the AFRs. Red line is stock ratios, very rich, blue line is tuned ratios.

http://i990.photobucket.com/albums/af28/kj380/kj380s%20Mitsubishi%20380/kj380SKRdyno17-4-10run2.jpg

Again check out the AFRs. Red line is 'base 380 map' Exede ratios, a bit too lean (over 15 in places), blue line is tuned ratios (same as previous chart).

Thought I'd post this up here too, as it's a 380 engine, so technically a 380 dyno result!


Car: KJ2 AWD
Mods: 6G75 swap, extractors, 200 cpi cat, 2.5" catback, plus straight through muffler
Dyno: SKR Mainline DynoLog Chassis Dyno with all runs in 3rd gear.
Power: 134.4 KW ATW @ 110KPH
Torque: 535.5 NM @ 84KPH

http://i644.photobucket.com/albums/uu168/alscall/awd_380_skr.jpg

The lower figure was a 'base' tune with only AFR's corrected, before tidying it up & adding some spark.

This is the comparison of Graham Bell's best/ final tune against my final tune.

Differences are that mine is a stock engine, with full exhaust upgrade - Graham's is cams, headwork, plus full exhaust minus the pipework from the cat to the rear muffler. Mine is also tuned for 98, whereas Graham's is not. (I think that's what the differences are anyway.)

http://i644.photobucket.com/albums/uu168/alscall/GBell_AKirk_AWD_Comparison.jpg

Last night I met up with a few mates, had a couple of drinks and decided to strap my 05 VRX to the DYNO for a power run!! haha

http://i753.photobucket.com/albums/xx180/blakestylez/380%20Dyno/BlakesIphone014.jpg

http://i753.photobucket.com/albums/xx180/blakestylez/380%20Dyno/BlakesIphone016.jpg

http://i753.photobucket.com/albums/xx180/blakestylez/380%20Dyno/BlakesIphone017.jpg

http://i753.photobucket.com/albums/xx180/blakestylez/380%20Dyno/BlakesIphone018.jpg

Video's with power figures will be up soon!

Car is dead stock... Did 2 runs on the dyno, one in 3rd and the other in 4th gear

Petrol was 91 RON

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnp_N2VwRrI

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r29HxOMgZS8

Stock as a rock 20,000 km old 2007 VRX baseline run before mods begin.

122 fwkw (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mbdSl6_-iY)

Induction noise is due to no airfilter or airbox. It actually lost torque and hence power everywhere except right at the top where it nosed over slightly later, giving the same peak power but at a few RPM higher than with the airbox.

Mainline Dyno at Graham West Workshops here in Adelaide. 91 RON fuel.

http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/5387/p9200554.jpg (http://img137.imageshack.us/i/p9200554.jpg/)

http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/8320/portraitd.jpg (http://img801.imageshack.us/i/portraitd.jpg/)

Blue line is 100% stock, Green line is no airbox/filter - just open airflow meter. Obviously no airbox flows better (especially considering the compromised flow into the AFM with box and filter on), but with the increased flow comes enrichment by the ECU (see AFR trace) which kills power considerably due to overly rich mixtures.

380 VRX III

Mods: 90mm intake

Fuel:98

Best run: 136.2KW

http://img148.imageshack.us/img148/5685/380dyno.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/148/380dyno.jpg/)

Bit dissapointed with my results...

http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b266/carbonseals/moregear020.jpg
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b266/carbonseals/moregear009.jpg

Premium 95 fuel
90mm galant intake
warm day, car was on a dyno set up for rwd, sucked a bit of hot air I think.