Hi everyone.

just curious about what your average 0-100kmh is?

so if you want to, tell us in this format (or something similar)....

model:
engine / engine mods:
transmission:
km's:
people in the car at the time:
full/empty fuel:
time:

here is mine...
Te 3.0l
cai and cam adjustment.
manual
150xxx
3 people including driver
3/4 tank of fuel
8.15 seconds.


cant wait to see what some of the supercharged 3rd gens get.
Next.........

Think mine is around 8.5, but never timed it accurately, only perf. mod is panel/exhaust, auto and 3L

S/C 3rd gens will probably get around 6

8.5 in an auto is pretty good.

i dont think the fwd supercharged magnas will get much better the 6.5 as the probably cant get the power to the road.
although, the trd aurion (4.0l sc) does it in around 6 with 241 kw at the fly.

i am sure some sc magnas could be that at the wheels?

I havent done a time with the redback system in it but with my current mods minus the redback (with a mate in the car) filming the run then checking the exact timing on the PC i got 7.8 seconds on a cool night.


although, the trd aurion (4.0l sc) does it in around 6 with 241 kw at the fly.


TRD aurion is a 3.5l supercharged.

mines about 8.5-9 seconds

switching to second at about 60-70..

model: '96 TE Altera
engine / engine mods: stock engine, no mods
transmission: automatic
km's: 183xxx
people in the car at the time: 2
full/empty fuel: half
time: 8.5-9.0

MY02 TJ Advance (3.5)
Ezboy TB K&N filter
Auto
130k
2
Near full
around 8, my gf's dad who drive the magnas when the cops had them said "your car must be a freak, magnas shouldn't be that fast! Don't remember the cop magnas being like this"

my car would be quicker if i didnt have to change into 3rd.

i will do a run in first and second (one gear change instead of 2) and tell you how much better it is. only problem with that is it has to go to about 6300 rpm.

model: 97 TF magna
engine / engine mods: K&N Filter, Sports exhaust high flow
transmission: Auto :(
km's: 202 ***
people in the car at the time: 2
full/empty fuel: just filled up
time: 9 seconds roughly. partly uphill tho, haha excuses ;)

Tried a quiet few times with only hand held stop watch
and got low 7s always on a flat road
did it quiet a few time with same result (thinking way to low)
but always about the same
tj2 auto and it was hard of the mark loading t convertor

TJ VRX tippy
probably about 18 seconds, i dunno. too lazy to put my foot down hard enough to find out :P

I timed my once a little while ago, was mid to high 7's, on a cool dry night.

model: KE Verada
engine / engine mods: 3.5L - K&N, Pacemaker Headers, Magnaflow Highflow Cat and Redback 2.5" exhaust.
transmission: 4sp Auto.
people in the car at the time: me.
full/empty fuel: meh I dunno, probably about half.
time: 11pm roughly.

3.5l manual TH 0-100km 6.5secs. continously. Mods catback exhaust

TJ02 sports with magnaflow exhaust and sealed pod, at night and half a tank of 98 octane fuel did about 7 flat.

3.5l manual TH 0-100km 6.5secs. continously. Mods catback exhaust

no way. with only an exhust?

3.5l manual TH 0-100km 6.5secs. continously. Mods catback exhaust

Not so sure bout that...........quicker than a wrx.

3.5l manual TH 0-100km 6.5secs. continously. Mods catback exhaust

Thats as quick if not quicker than a manual ralliart :doubt:

EDIT: its actually .2 secs faster than a manual Ralliart which had a lot more power and a LSD

maybe downhill?? lol

but then again maybe proper weight reduction good conditions and only you in the car plus not alot of fuel. Bare in mind the sports is faster then the vrx because the kit adds a fair bit of weight. and the only difference between stock and sports/vrx is the rear muffler

my car would be quicker if i didnt have to change into 3rd.

i will do a run in first and second (one gear change instead of 2) and tell you how much better it is. only problem with that is it has to go to about 6300 rpm.

why does it have to go to 6300rpm you would find your car would be better off getting changed at around 5800rpm cos its lost its steam by 6300 and wasting time getting it there. although you can be gaining speed you are well part your max torque and power, and and changing earlier will bring it back into the power band.


but then again maybe proper weight reduction good conditions and only you in the car plus not alot of fuel. Bare in mind the sports is faster then the vrx because the kit adds a fair bit of weight. and the only difference between stock and sports/vrx is the rear muffler

body kit adds about 30kgs...small kid really not that much. Muffler as well as cams and ecu tweak were the differences

but then again maybe proper weight reduction good conditions and only you in the car plus not alot of fuel. Bare in mind the sports is faster then the vrx because the kit adds a fair bit of weight. and the only difference between stock and sports/vrx is the rear muffler

True but its also a 10yr old car, and that figure for the Ralliart is when its basically brand new, so still dont believe it, unless its like on a fair decline lol

mitsubishi number 7 cam or something? standard on all 3.5 for tj i think only ralliart are different with 10% more lift. Oh and yea tht would make sense the kit prolli isnt as heavy as i was estimating

Yeah, it's not that heavy, just thin abs plastic.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiTSn2Ti4b8

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiTSn2Ti4b8

That vid is a bit suss, it shows a GTV doin 0-100 in less than 7 seconds, that just isnt right.

why does it have to go to 6300rpm you would find your car would be better off getting changed at around 5800rpm cos its lost its steam by 6300 and wasting time getting it there. although you can be gaining speed you are well part your max torque and power, and and changing earlier will bring it back into the power band.



body kit adds about 30kgs...small kid really not that much. Muffler as well as cams and ecu tweak were the differences

i know this thats why i did the first one with 2 changes. (1st-2nd 2nd-3rd)

That vid is a bit suss, it shows a GTV doin 0-100 in less than 7 seconds, that just isnt right.

I kinda timed it around 7.5 sec.

MY02 TJ Advance (3.5)
Ezboy TB K&N filter
Auto
130k
2
Near full
around 8, my gf's dad who drive the magnas when the cops had them said "your car must be a freak, magnas shouldn't be that fast! Don't remember the cop magnas being like this"

thats cuz cops drove the AWD magnas = extra weight = slower
or mabey that hetic K&N filter lol

Thats as quick if not quicker than a manual ralliart :doubt:

EDIT: its actually .2 secs faster than a manual Ralliart which had a lot more power and a LSD

also about the same as a vy ss commodore (auto).

crumadore

Power 235kW @ 5200rpm

Torque 465Nm @ 4400-4400rpm

Acceleration 0-100Km/h (secs) 6.6

Kerb Weight (kg) 1609

th sports manual


Power 147kW @ 5000rpm

Torque 300Nm @ 4000-4000rpm

Acceleration 0-100Km/h (secs) 8.2

Kerb Weight (kg) 1430

(from redbook.)


hmmmm.:wtf:

I kinda timed it around 7.5 sec.

That sounds about right, guessing they weigh a bit more than a regular magna/verada

AWD's had slight loss of KW due to the driveline Transferance. I think they were around 155 kw + a lil extra weight.

also, this is the tj sports manual:


Power 163kW @ 5250rpm

Torque 317Nm @ 4500-4500rpm

Acceleration 0-100Km/h (secs) 8.2



with the same kerb weight, but the torque comes in earlier. gotta love torque.

That sounds about right, guessing they weigh a bit more than a regular magna/verada

Hmmmm, i guess the spoiler and sat nav is extra weight, but they had the vrx/sports exhaust.

Hmmmm, i guess the spoiler and sat nav is extra weight, but they had the vrx/sports exhaust.

Also the power seats and that would weigh a bit im thinking

The Ralliart was Timed, when new, in manual form, at an avg of 6.71 sec. That's pretty darn quick

Also the power seats and that would weigh a bit im thinking

Didn't all kj radas have power drivers seat?

I dont bother with the 0-100 times in my magna......wheelspin is a major bitch unless the semis are nice and warm

I dont bother with the 0-100 times in my magna......wheelspin is a major bitch unless the semis are nice and warm

Nice problem to have Jase lol.

also, this is the tj sports manual:

with the same kerb weight, but the torque comes in earlier. gotta love torque.That Redbook 0-100 time is incorrect, it's not the same as a TH. The TJ VR-X was tested as capable of a 7.06s 0-100 stock.

VRX manual, muffler, hotdog, K&N, bunch of suspension mods. Haven't timed it but guessin its roughly 7 sec.

AWD's had slight loss of KW due to the driveline Transferance. I think they were around 155 kw + a lil extra weight.

AWD GTV/VRX/Sports had 159kW and not due to driveline transferance, but due to the fact that the rear bank exhaust pipe doing a 180 degrees turn (the pipework folds back on itself). Fitting the HM Header will solve that plus give a few more kWs and more importantly, more torque.

I'll time mine one of these days:
HM Headers, K&N panel, heavy duty tow bar with a kerb mass of 1700kgs.

can i ask where you guys go to time 0-100kmh times? in SA cos thats where I live

can i ask where you guys go to time 0-100kmh times? in SA cos thats where I live

Im sure everyone here has done it on a race track. As surely thats the only safe place right guys :kb:

hahaha

i mean like where in SA is there a straight 100km/h road? there's lonsdale road but its on a decline :(

hahaha

i mean like where in SA is there a straight 100km/h road? there's lonsdale road but its on a decline :(

The freeway to Melbourne. You can even get to 110km/hr.

hahaha

i mean like where in SA is there a straight 100km/h road? there's lonsdale road but its on a decline :(

or you could go the other way out on the highway towards port wakefield...

pt wakefield rd is pretty far away.. guess ill have to leave it until i go away sometime

find a nice stretch of road with nothing around, preferably at night as well

find a nice stretch of road with nothing around, preferably at night as well
When its harder to see what your approaching? Don't do it on a poorly lit road that has a speed limit below 100. As it is you'll be focusing more on your speedo than usual so you don't want to go exceeding any speed limits then having an accident as a result of your speed with lack of dedicated concentration to the road.

AWD GTV/VRX/Sports had 159kW and not due to driveline transferance, but due to the fact that the rear bank exhaust pipe doing a 180 degrees turn (the pipework folds back on itself). Fitting the HM Header will solve that plus give a few more kWs and more importantly, more torque.

I'll time mine one of these days:
HM Headers, K&N panel, heavy duty tow bar with a kerb mass of 1700kgs.

Yes the sport variants had 159kw, the standard Verada/magna awd had 154 kw. Ahhh, My mistake, i knew the exhaust was different just didn't know that it was the cause of loss of power. I'm sure there is extra weight too.
Also there were no GTV awd.

Just as a matter of interest, the tj VRX body kit adds 30 kgs.

Ange, Vlad drives an AWD GTV.

When its harder to see what your approaching? Don't do it on a poorly lit road that has a speed limit below 100. As it is you'll be focusing more on your speedo than usual so you don't want to go exceeding any speed limits then having an accident as a result of your speed with lack of dedicated concentration to the road.

agree with you, epecially after reading mozza's thread

Ange, Vlad drives an AWD GTV.


I think he's been a*** ;). Mitsubishi renamed it from GTV to GVTi due to complaints from another maker which uses GTV as a main name. Alpha Romeo GTV.

When its harder to see what your approaching? Don't do it on a poorly lit road that has a speed limit below 100. As it is you'll be focusing more on your speedo than usual so you don't want to go exceeding any speed limits then having an accident as a result of your speed with lack of dedicated concentration to the road.

He owns a TH, they have a speed alert (no need to look at the speedo). Just set it to 100 and off you go - lift off when you here it beep. How hard can it be? :P

It's only the TE's that didn't have this feature I believe? :)

I think he's been a*** ;). Mitsubishi renamed it from GTV to GVTi due to complaints from another maker which uses GTV as a main name. Alpha Romeo GTV.

lol..nah sorry mate, no offence intended. I wasn't even thinking about your model:tired: I was thinking KJ GTV..Sorry Vlad.
:beer:

i did mine again with (still up into third, full tank of fuel and 2 ppl in the car) and got 7.8seconds on average. last time te ducting came off the MAS so it had engine bay air,as well as poor a/f mix as when air blows passed the MAS it messes with it and it runs like a subaru.

and it runs like a subaru.
What a useless comparison.

What a useless comparison.

what a useles post.:roll:

My TL takes an age to get 100km/h man. I'd say at least 8.5 seconds.

the awd is only slightly down on engine power compared to the fwd models, but has greater driveline loss and loses a fair bit to the wheels

My tj did 7.0 seconds on the f3. That was with a fair amount of wheel spin as I wasn't driving, 2 people in the car with a bit of luggage and subs, I thought it was a good result seeing it was after 4 hours of driving from up north.

6.5 secs timing in my car is very possible. This was one of my slower 0-100km without a launch timed about 6.5 to 6.7secs.?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9desKxKZaPo&feature=channel_page

TJ2 AWD
3.5
Natmo at present
7.7 over 8 runs with stopwatch in hand :D Std dev 0.2
Would be quicker if there was less lag between 2nd and 3rd gear changes :/

the awd is only slightly down on engine power compared to the fwd models, but has greater driveline loss and loses a fair bit to the wheelsAnd nearly 200kg.

6.5 secs timing in my car is very possible. This was one of my slower 0-100km without a launch timed about 6.5 to 6.7secs.?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9desKxKZaPo&feature=channel_page

To my eyes, that vid shows me about 7.5-8 seconds.

To my eyes, that vid shows me about 7.5-8 seconds.

Mmmmm i agree. There is no way a stock TH can pull under 7secs

And nearly 200kg.

no...depending on model more like 100 kg.

how are people timing? Stopwatch in car = fail

how are people timing? Stopwatch in car = fail
iPhone app?

how are people timing? Stopwatch in car = fail

Yeh its not hard to loose a second + when using a stopwatch

exactly. When talking about split second timings, using a stopwatch doesnt deliver accuracy! Timings over a standing KM with a stopwatch are ok since margin of error is larger.

no...depending on model more like 100 kg.TJ Sports to AWD, 164kg, TW VR-X to AWD, 110kg, so somewhere in the middle

TJ Sports to AWD, 164kg, TW VR-X to AWD, 110kg, so somewhere in the middle

Back on topic: how fast do you think your car can do the 0-100 crossing the SA border...lol

All I've timed is 8 dead without launching it or slipping it at all (so making it accelerate from idle) and 2 (poor) gearchanges. Never bothered to repeat it. I timed the run from a video taken of it.

Can people send me there videos of there manual V6 0-100.

Nope.

Nope.


You wont do it your scared.

Yeah. So scared, I need a nappy change.

kurt why dont you post a video of your car doin 0 - 100, as it is sooooooo much faster than anyone else here.

kurt why dont you post a video of your car doin 0 - 100, as it is sooooooo much faster than anyone else here.

He did, HERE (http://www.aussiemagna.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1049120&postcount=61)

Sure as hell doesnt look like a 6.5sec to 100kmh run tho, surprisingly lol

My stopwatch puts it at a high 6, which I find hard to believe. Flatshifting is a pretty dumb idea, though.

My stopwatch puts it at a high 6, which I find hard to believe. Flatshifting is a pretty dumb idea, though.

Not impossible, might have great front tyres and the perfect start could probably do it, then again he could be taking this "run" on a declining road. Certainly not anywhere near the 6.3 he has claimed elsewhere on this forum :nuts:

Yeah. I want to try a more aggressive run in my car now but I'm trying to preserve the clutch

model: TJ series 1
engine / engine mods: none
transmission: El Manuel
km's: 126xxx
people in the car at the time:me
full/empty fuel: full
time: 7.7

I'm still not the most experienced driver, So I wasnt expecting the fastest time...

Like i said i timed my video in the 6 second region. But i never said my car was faster than everyone elses ben. My speedo could be out but who knows.

If you're saying your car did it in 6.3 secs then you are basically saying it's faster than everyone else.

6 second region. does not mean 6.3 witch i origionally said. Cause i timed it again a couple of times and did slower.

Time's from when te car was standard;
model: TJ Exec, sedan
engine / engine mods: - 3.5, Standard everything
transmission: four speed auto
km's: 130,000km
people in the car at the time: 1
full/empty fuel: full
time: 8.5

Modified;
model: TJ Exec, sedan
engine / engine mods: - 3.5, Exhaust upgraded, alloy 15" wheels, lowered.
transmission: four speed auto
km's: 155,000km
people in the car at the time: 1
full/empty fuel: full
time: 7.3

It's hard to find places to do good 0-100's around here. Too many hills and/or the roads are sh!t.

I'd like to think there may be half a second off these times again on a good road.

How are u timing?

There are very few real world situations where a 0 to 100 KPH time is important, so I don't want to know if my TJ does it in 5.1 seconds or 15.1 seconds. Can someone explain the importance of this number? Is it just bragging rights? Like "My car is faster, so I must be smarter/more handsome/more likely to pull chicks/get a better job than you" type of thing?

*Best Pauline Hanson nasal voice* Pleez explain!

Best justification will see me strap a jet engine to the roof of my TJ to beat all of your times! lol

please explain:
1) it gives you an idea of overtaking ability.
eg: 0-100 in 15 seconds = stay behind the truck and get there eventually.
0-100 in 5 seconds = was that a truck or a moke that we just went around?

2) acceleration is more fun than speed.

3) slower time generally means less fuel gobbling for people that can't control their right foot.

4) my **** is bigger than your **** = bragging rights.

there's a few reasons. Other people might have their own.

As long as my car's 0-100 is no worse than 10 seconds, then I'm moderately happy.



What has 0-100 got to do with rolling acceleration when overtaking trucks? 0-100 has little relevance to in-gear acceleration.
I'd strongly beg to differ with Dave's comment, but this is a NO SPAM section of the forum so I won't create a new post.

TH station wagon
Manual
6G75 (HM Headers and cat back exhaust)

still trying to perfect balancing the launch to get traction, but the best I've done is 6.42 sec (electronically timed- not stopwatch)


80-120km/h is a great yardstick to use when you talk about streetable power.

please explain:
1) it gives you an idea of overtaking ability.
eg: 0-100 in 15 seconds = stay behind the truck and get there eventually.
0-100 in 5 seconds = was that a truck or a moke that we just went around?

2) acceleration is more fun than speed.

3) slower time generally means less fuel gobbling for people that can't control their right foot.

4) my **** is bigger than your **** = bragging rights.

there's a few reasons. Other people might have their own.

As long as my car's 0-100 is no worse than 10 seconds, then I'm moderately happy.

What has 0-100 got to do with rolling acceleration when overtaking trucks? 0-100 has little relevance to in-gear acceleration.

will try get a video soon to post up, only have to do one gear change so will interested to see if that helps.

TJ 3.5ltr 4sp auto wagon 9 seconds dead, and a stock auto TE 3ltr 9.8 seconds.

^ That sounds realistic.

On a flat road iv gotten between 6.8 -7 secs /100km I have a 2003 tj Magna sports with a full redback exhaust

Timed with?

On a flat road iv gotten between 6.8 -7 secs /100km I have a 2003 tj Magna sports with a full redback exhaust

is it auto or manual

i dont think it would be as quick as a ralliart with only the exhaust modded

Who's got a camera with a mount to lend me?? I want to see my 0-100 lol

heres a vid i got, undulating road, just me, sub etc in boot. duffed the take off need ALOT more practice with launching definitely!! anyone care to hazard a time? oh 5spd tiptronic.

http://s694.photobucket.com/albums/vv302/robssei/95%20Diamante%2030M/?action=view&current=21092011002.mp4
Oh edit; car is stock, apart from cat converter removed , podfilter in airbox (has gap between front and rear section where panel filter goes) and lowered, oh and trans cooler lol.

Wow, Robssei. I'd say that's about 6.5 seconds at a guess. Definitely under 7 I think.

If you have some video editing software (Ulead video studio, etc), you should be able to determine exactly which frame you start to move and when the speedo hits 102. Trim the clip to those 2 points and the video editing suite will tell you exactly how long the video, probably down to 1/25th of a second (depending on how many FPS your video is at).

ahhh could be a good idea, it was filmed on my nokia e63, so framerate wont be great. wouldnt mind some 80-120 times, want to compare dropping to second, then third or just to third and using more rev range. Feels quicker dropping to second, high rev fun lol

Wow, Robssei. I'd say that's about 6.5 seconds at a guess. Definitely under 7 I think.

If you have some video editing software (Ulead video studio, etc), you should be able to determine exactly which frame you start to move and when the speedo hits 102. Trim the clip to those 2 points and the video editing suite will tell you exactly how long the video, probably down to 1/25th of a second (depending on how many FPS your video is at).


I took the liberty of doing that and it comes out around 6.8-6.9 seconds.

80-120km/h is around 4 seconds flat.

In terms of its importance, I guess it's nice to know how long your car will take to match the speed of traffic on a freeway in the event that you have had to pull over and stop on the hard shoulder. It can be difficult to judge the speed of traffic approaching in your mirrors but if you time how long it takes for an approaching car to pass you, and you know long your car takes to get to 100kph, then you can determine from what distance away an approaching car needs to be so that you can floor it and merge out onto the freeway without causing an accident.

I took the liberty of doing that and it comes out around 6.8-6.9 seconds.

80-120km/h is around 4 seconds flat.

Chhers mate, im sure i can cut that down, my take off was terrible, was stupid and tried it while holding ph and shifting, i know, retarded! Ill set up a rig and see if i can get it down. I reckon 6.5 possible, i didnt load up the torque converter. Just strait from idle.

I did tests at drag racing and found no real difference when stalling it up hard versus just a little bit of revs before releasing the brake. AWD Sports Tiptronic 3.5.

Her are some charts from Evoscan showing three 0-100kmph runs in my Magna;

http://imgur.com/a/zJtmU#Vt2FJ

Same stretch of road, just up and back. Was trying for five runs for a good average, but I think I was attracting unwanted attention. Did these on some bumpy ar$e bit of back road.

Run#3
http://i.imgur.com/SbxCv.jpg

Run #2
http://i.imgur.com/wPdDc.jpg

Run #1
http://i.imgur.com/Vt2FJ.jpg


Stalled it up on run #1 and lost a little traction. Run two I just eased into it. Run three was a straight tramp , no brakes.

Full tank of fuel. Just me in the car. Was probably a twelve kilometer drive to where I did these run, so everything was at operating temp.

The charts dont display the time well (formatting), so I added a column to show time vs speed.

Managed to get the AWD TL motivated to 100 in 7.23 secs.
This was timed using an iphone dyno app which starts timing when movement is detected.
Had myself and a mate in the car, half a tank of petrol and about the same of LPG.
Took off from the emergency lane of an empty freeway, quite flat but had the passenger side of the car in the dirt lol
Engine Mods:
6G75 Conversion
Hurricane Headers
Sports muffler
K&N Filter

Tipping if i strip the 60+ kgs of sound gear, drop the passenger and run the tanks down a bit id easily get into the mid to high 6's


:)

Good old 3.0 TF Magna Auto wheezes its way to 100 in 8.7 - 8.8 seconds.

This was under the conditions of:

- Flat ground
- No passengers
- Minimal wind
- 16 degree sunny day

The car was stock.

good to have some real world times. i need to get a reliable way to record times

good to have some real world times. i need to get a reliable way to record times

Robssei that thing must give u a kick in the ass when that thing hits mivec it flys mate.

0-100km manual 3.5l maggie. I reckon its under 6 secs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iq756crWLf0

I reckon high 6s. Quick, sounds great too!

I reckon high 6s. Quick, sounds great too!

High 6 u reckon.? I timed it heaps of times all different types and got 6 seconds flat or 5.9secs?

Thats fast. You must rev to the,limiter in 1st? It goes very quick. Dont think my ralliart could do that

Thats fast. You must rev to the,limiter in 1st? It goes very quick. Dont think my ralliart could do that

Yeh that video was done before i fitted my lsd. It was just before the rev limiter but didnt hit the limiter. But goes well i know that my cars pritty light would be abit lighter than a ralliart magna.

Robssei that thing must give u a kick in the ass when that thing hits mivec it flys mate.
it does! i need to perfect my take off for sure lol, that was my and only run ive ever tried lol. could help to take out the 50kg subbox, kids carseats etc haha . definitely want to get a better rear muffler, i think the factory jdm one is restrictive. nice run dude very quick!

Her are some charts from Evoscan showing three 0-100kmph runs in my Magna;

http://imgur.com/a/zJtmU#Vt2FJ

Same stretch of road, just up and back. Was trying for five runs for a good average, but I think I was attracting unwanted attention. Did these on some bumpy ar$e bit of back road.

Run#3
http://i.imgur.com/SbxCv.jpg

Run #2
http://i.imgur.com/wPdDc.jpg

Run #1
http://i.imgur.com/Vt2FJ.jpg


Stalled it up on run #1 and lost a little traction. Run two I just eased into it. Run three was a straight tramp , no brakes.

Full tank of fuel. Just me in the car. Was probably a twelve kilometer drive to where I did these run, so everything was at operating temp.

The charts dont display the time well (formatting), so I added a column to show time vs speed.


Updated with figures from my TL GTVi

Link to imgur Galery (http://imgur.com/a/Y1b3W)

Turns out the TL is slower to 100kmph despite the claimed extra power and five speed auto. The extra weight of the TL is probably to blame.