PDA

View Full Version : manual conversion & fuel economy



cooperplace
15-10-2009, 08:59 PM
a Q for people who've done manual conversions: how, if at all, has it helped your fuel economy? I'm talking about 3.5l

thanks

Life
15-10-2009, 09:03 PM
FYI On the highway consumption will be slightly higher due to the gear ratio of 5th on the manual boxes

lowrider
15-10-2009, 09:05 PM
my consumption droped, manuals are better on fuel.
hense why every car is a manual in Europe

Sharkie
15-10-2009, 10:14 PM
I'll let you know when i get mine done which is very soon.
going from 5 spd trip to 5 spd manual.

wookiee
16-10-2009, 07:39 AM
depends if you're going from 4sp or 5sp auto...

I went from 4sp auto to manual and around town I'm getting a bit better economy. like Life said, on the highway it's worse than the auto. cruising at 110km/h used to be 2200rpm, now it's 2700rpm.

that said, I do most of my driving around town and have another car that I take on long trips.

cheers,
.wook

Andrei1984
16-10-2009, 11:40 AM
Not always to do with fuel economy, the fact is due to torque converter in autos & higher gear ratios small engines struggle to pull thats all, in Europe (where i lived most of my life) people belive that anything with 4 cyl needs a manual.... when i go over there & say i own a 3,5 litre car, everyone is :eek2:

Auto means not necessarily higher consuption all depends how you drive & where you drive, have a look at stats with mitsu colt with CVT auto vs manual...

While yes i do have to agree most manual cars do give better consumption vs auto in city driving.

[TUFFTR]
16-10-2009, 02:41 PM
Also gotta realise that in an auto, being so low in 5th is great cause with cruise it downgears for you, in a manual cruise cant downgear.....so its gotta have enough poke to move you along aswell....

kylegc
16-10-2009, 02:45 PM
when i did mine i went from bout 450-500 a tank but after it was more like 550+ depending on my driving

typhoon
16-10-2009, 07:24 PM
Don't forget that the autos lock up the torque converter around 80 km/h, so you will not see any advantages on the highway from a manual, the auto essentially behaves as if it was a manual trans when locked up, the only losses are from the hydraulic pump in the gearbox.
The manuals are more economical argument died in the late 80's when 4 speed lock up autos appeared.

Regards, Andrew.

Madmagna
17-10-2009, 08:50 PM
Rubbish

AA converter locks at 80 until there is load and then unlocks and even then the trans may shift under heavy load

I have gained better economy both around town and on a trip. I have done 2 recent long trips (Adelaide and Sydney), Adelaide was towing a trailer and got similar to what I used to get with the Auto, Sydney with no Trailer and highway economy was slightly better, would have before got about 600 at a stretch, was getting about 660 or there abouts

Round town is also a lot better, used to hit around 450 a tank, now easy 550 a tank

Tobed0g
17-10-2009, 09:16 PM
Auto means not necessarily higher consuption all depends how you drive & where you drive, have a look at stats with mitsu colt with CVT auto vs manual...

Comparing a CVT to a normal automatic isn't very intelligent dude. Completely different systems.

CVT's (Constant Variable Transmission) is changing the gear ratios all the time to keep the engine at peak efficiency, whereas a normal auto just clunks its way though the gears.

kylegc
18-10-2009, 05:51 AM
the cvt autos have no gears. they engenieer flat spots into them so it feels like they change but they dont. works kinda like a mountian bike chain but no seperate gears

HRD2GT
18-10-2009, 06:33 AM
Manual a lot better in economy, I got arround 6 L/100 km diffrence from 5 spd tippy to 5 spd Manual plus heaps of fun :P