Barry
20-01-2011, 01:48 PM
Hi badcredit25
The Fuel Rail Tuning kit was first developed when I fitted a high-flow air filter to my TJ2 and found a definite flat spot at around off-idle to 2500 rpm
This is because the original (restrictive) air filter forms part of the intake tuning – limiting the air going in gives an effective enrichment, as well as reducing emissions
I did a lot of research and found that heating the fuel by a specified amount causes the fuel to better combine with the intake air, giving improved combustion and noticeably better torque (and no more flat spot)
Actually what is happening is that the fuel is enriched in terms of air/fuel ratio, thus giving the improvement in torque AND the responsiveness of the improved combustion of the fuel
This is evident on a permanent EGO sensor display, which I use constantly in all my developments as I on-road test
In fact the response shows similar to what you would get with an accelerator pump
(I know – I didn’t believe it at first, either!)
Heating fuel for improvement has been around since before you and I were born – it’s just that engineers have been trying to do it across the whole rev range, whereas the Magna loss in power is best solved by doing it at the fuel rail
(I’ll have more to say about that later)
At higher revs than 3000, the kit transfers less heat thus giving cooler fuel injection
No, the kit does NOT cause the engine to run lean – just the opposite - in fact it is now so effective that you can now run your Magna in the lower rev range (and lower throttle opening) and still have the ‘pick-up’ that you should have, without the need to ‘tramp on it’
In fact, only recently I came across a reference to American Mitsubishi where the fuel is run below optimum temp in order to reduce fuel vapour emissions, and this is what gives excessive sooty deposits at the exhaust pipe
Of course now you can see that, when the whole design is implemented, that the engine is running better than before, with NO increase in raw fuel required
With more than 70 kits in use, the performance is well proven
Additional benefits are less soot and EGR deposits on spark plugs and soot than can clog up TB’s and mufflers
I’ll answer the rest of your post when I get some more time
Regards, Barry
sorry i dont see the point of heating the fuel rail either, the fuel is constantly being returned to tank, so it would take friggin ages to heat it ALL upto what ever temp you are chasing, sorry but id like to see dyno sheet with/without before id put money on it
Hi Badcredit25
Thankyou for taking the time to postup
This is a good question that many have trouble understanding
From the way you have worded your question, I take it that you think up to a full tank of fuel must be fully heated before the kit can work - but this is not so
Actually the answer is quite simple
The fuel rail tuning kit draws heat by conduction directly from the engine
The design of the existing fuel rail is such that the large diameter common rail slows down the flow of the fuel, enabling it to absorb just enough heat to raise the temp of the fuel by the required amount
This all happens at the engine, not at the return, which then has very little bearing on the outcome
Cheers, Barry
The Fuel Rail Tuning kit was first developed when I fitted a high-flow air filter to my TJ2 and found a definite flat spot at around off-idle to 2500 rpm
This is because the original (restrictive) air filter forms part of the intake tuning – limiting the air going in gives an effective enrichment, as well as reducing emissions
I did a lot of research and found that heating the fuel by a specified amount causes the fuel to better combine with the intake air, giving improved combustion and noticeably better torque (and no more flat spot)
Actually what is happening is that the fuel is enriched in terms of air/fuel ratio, thus giving the improvement in torque AND the responsiveness of the improved combustion of the fuel
This is evident on a permanent EGO sensor display, which I use constantly in all my developments as I on-road test
In fact the response shows similar to what you would get with an accelerator pump
(I know – I didn’t believe it at first, either!)
Heating fuel for improvement has been around since before you and I were born – it’s just that engineers have been trying to do it across the whole rev range, whereas the Magna loss in power is best solved by doing it at the fuel rail
(I’ll have more to say about that later)
At higher revs than 3000, the kit transfers less heat thus giving cooler fuel injection
No, the kit does NOT cause the engine to run lean – just the opposite - in fact it is now so effective that you can now run your Magna in the lower rev range (and lower throttle opening) and still have the ‘pick-up’ that you should have, without the need to ‘tramp on it’
In fact, only recently I came across a reference to American Mitsubishi where the fuel is run below optimum temp in order to reduce fuel vapour emissions, and this is what gives excessive sooty deposits at the exhaust pipe
Of course now you can see that, when the whole design is implemented, that the engine is running better than before, with NO increase in raw fuel required
With more than 70 kits in use, the performance is well proven
Additional benefits are less soot and EGR deposits on spark plugs and soot than can clog up TB’s and mufflers
I’ll answer the rest of your post when I get some more time
Regards, Barry
sorry i dont see the point of heating the fuel rail either, the fuel is constantly being returned to tank, so it would take friggin ages to heat it ALL upto what ever temp you are chasing, sorry but id like to see dyno sheet with/without before id put money on it
Hi Badcredit25
Thankyou for taking the time to postup
This is a good question that many have trouble understanding
From the way you have worded your question, I take it that you think up to a full tank of fuel must be fully heated before the kit can work - but this is not so
Actually the answer is quite simple
The fuel rail tuning kit draws heat by conduction directly from the engine
The design of the existing fuel rail is such that the large diameter common rail slows down the flow of the fuel, enabling it to absorb just enough heat to raise the temp of the fuel by the required amount
This all happens at the engine, not at the return, which then has very little bearing on the outcome
Cheers, Barry